On Being Right
© David Moorhead — February 2007
Subscribe to Staying Awake ezine
You see, in a topsy-turvy world stirred by stories about our planet, our cultures,
and ourselves as humans, it’s too easy to shirk the fascinating idea that
humans are just not what we’ve pumped ourselves up to be.
Humans are like an apostrophe to all of creation rather than the reason for
it. ~ DM
In our hubris, we could feel smug on being right about answers to queries of
unknown realms, for instance, on the sun and climate change.
Many of us assume a cloak of control over what we want to believe is true and
attempt to manage zig-zags in our homes and lifestyles. However, considering
ourselves absolutely right, we’d be wiser to reconsider old beliefs converging
with a new batch of supposed concerns for us and our global sisters and brothers.
There’s a way of being that keeps us believing we’ve already
got the answers, and feeling resolute on being right. I have to admit I’m
still grieving that all answers to disturbing queries no longer spring out
of one source, like religious moralistic platitudes, or any new thought espoused
as a pet metaphysical enlightenment.
Until we’re studying and discussing sacrifices inherent in extinction,
then the repackaged and retailed language of metaphysics and traditional worn
out poetic religious sentimentality can only keep Earthlings unconscious and
unhappy throughout the current species’ transformation. ~ DM
Just ponder what people are talking about; there are so many political and
environmental dilemmas, one’s awareness vexes at the humongous effects.
Apparently, no right answers exist what with all the memes in judgments, opinions,
and evaluations floating about science. Anthropologists, political scientists,
astronomers, cosmologists, and other kinds of scientists who’ve been closeted
too long, are painting similar pictures on being right, framed by their particular
specialties on global plights. Staying Awake ezine delights in relaying
their messages as best it can.
Are our children or our grandchildren going to look back 20 years and wonder
if we stayed awake to plans for taking care of each other in critical times?
Are they to wonder why our high priority on being right about politically
correct home and business environments? If so, our buying and selling of politically
correct light bulbs, thermostats, and washing machines probably won’t
seem as important to them as to us. Our progenies would see clearly our delusions,
assuming an inevitable abrupt wake-up call was sounded. The future aftermath
is only our children’s beginning.*
Our future families could perceive us Earthlings as prancing jesters, nearly
wearied by notions we could actually have halted Earth’s disruptions and
societal systems’ cascading failures. A great travesty about being right
is the joke we’re playing on ourselves when we applaud the politically
savvy alluding science by proclaiming moralistic metaphors as they present us
with a bunch of material environmental things to buy.
*This is the premise for Thomas Homer-Dixon’s
book, The Upside of Down: Leveraging Catastrophe for Positive Change.
He is the director of the Trudeau Centre for the Study of Peace and Conflict,
University of Toronto, Canada.
[…] Simply
managing our problems is no longer good enough. As population, energy, environmental,
and economic stresses build in force deep underneath our societies, as our
technologies grow more complex and interconnected, and as events in one place
increasingly cause effects that cascade around the planet, major system failure
becomes more likely.
But rather than giving up in despair, we must embrace
this possibility as an opportunity for revolutionary change. By adopting a
prospective mind—a mindset adapted to constant surprise and instability—we
can create something new from the unexpected, and something useful from turmoil
and crisis.
Our constant curiosity
is key
to watching what’s being created.
~ David Moorhead |